IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
October 3, 2007
TODD WEISS, ET AL., PLAINTIFF,
VILLAGE OF BROOKLYN, ET AL., DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the court is defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement. (Doc. 3). Plaintiffs have not responded to the motion, and the time for doing so has now expired. The court deems the failure to respond to be an admission of the merits of the motion. SDIL-LR 7.1(g).
Upon consideration and for good cause shown, defendants' Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. 3) is GRANTED. On or before October 24, 2007, plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint which complies with the requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8.
Defendants shall file responsive pleadings to the amended complaint in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.