Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

White v. Walker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


September 13, 2007

DEWAN WHITE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to compel defendant Adrian Feinerman to respond to interrogatories propounded on or about April 25, 2007. (Docs. 33 and 34). Defendant Feinerman responds that in an attempt to answer plaintiff's interrogatories, plaintiff's medical records have been subpoenaed, but not yet received. (Doc. 37).

After reviewing plaintiff's interrogatories, and in appreciation of the fact that the events at issue occurred more than two years ago, defendant Feinerman's delay in responding to the interrogatories is understandable.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 33) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time by which defendant Feinerman must respond to plaintiff's interrogatories is hereby extended to October 15, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20070913

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.