Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ware v. Garnett

August 31, 2007

ERIC WARE, AND YUMBA LASUMBA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JASON GARNETT, AND CHAPLAIN LOVE, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff Ware's Motion for Sanctions. (Doc. 88). Defendants filed a response at Doc. 89.

Plaintiff seeks the imposition of sanctions due to defendants' alleged failure to supplement their response to one of his interrogatories. On June 14, 2007, the court ordered defendants to supplement their answer to plaintiff's interrogatory number 11 by June 28, 2007. On June 28, 2007, defendants filed a notice that they had done so. See, Docs. 83 & 85. Plaintiff mailed the instant motion on June 30, 2007, evidently before he received the supplemental answer.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff Ware's Motion for Sanctions (Doc. 88) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20070831

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.