Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tate & Lyle Technology Limited v. AIDP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION


August 28, 2007

TATE & LYLE TECHNOLOGY LIMITED AND TATE & LYLE SUCRALOSE, INC., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
AIDP, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael P. McCUSKEY Chief Judge

ORDER

A Report and Recommendation (#56) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on July 19, 2007. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant AIDP's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue (#41) is GRANTED.

(2) Defendant AIDP is terminated as a party to this litigation based upon lack of personal jurisdiction.

(3) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

ENTERED this 28th day of August, 2007

20070828

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.