IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
July 25, 2007
OILY H. THOMAS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is plaintiffs Thomas and Armstrong's motion to strike the defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 26) because it failed to state a viable legal defense. (Doc. 28; see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f)).
This Court has issued a Report and Recommendation as to the defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 26), in which plaintiff's arguments were analyzed. This Court found the defendants arguments well taken and now adopts the analysis of the Report and Recommendation for purposes of this motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to strike the defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 28) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.