Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Strode v. City of Venice

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


June 26, 2007

MARVIN B. STRODE AND MARQUITTA A. MCAFEE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
THE CITY OF VENICE, ILLINOIS, TYRONE ECHOLS, JAMES E. NEWSOME, SHAWN TYLER, WILLIAM E. GARRETT, TIMOTHY J. FISK AND BRADLEY JONES, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is the plaintiffs' motion to extend the discovery deadline. (Doc. 55).

Plaintiffs want to obtain additional written discovery and depositions. Plaintiff s further note that they still need to locate and subpoena Jeremy Harrell. Plaintiffs ask that discovery be permitted up to and including July 22, 2007. Defendants have not responded to the subject motion.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the plaintiffs' motion to extend the discovery deadline (Doc. 55) is GRANTED, in that discovery will be permitted through August 10, 2007 (so that defendants will have the full 30 day response period for written discovery). No further extensions will be granted under any circumstances.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20070626

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.