Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Obermeier v. Ott

June 6, 2007

DOYLE V. OBERMEIER, PETITIONER,
v.
ANDREW K. OTT, ACTING WARDEN, GRAHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Jeanne E. Scott, U.S. District Judge

OPINION

This cause is before the Court on Petitioner Doyle Obermeier's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (d/e 2). This is the initial consideration of Petitioner's Petition under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.

After a review of the Petition, this Court finds that a summary dismissal is not warranted. Therefore, pursuant to Rule 4, the Court directs the Attorney General for the State of Illinois to respond to Petitioner Obermeier's Petition. The response shall discuss the merits and the procedural posture of the Petition, i.e. whether Petitioner has exhausted his state remedies and/or procedurally defaulted any claims. See Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.

THEREFORE, the Attorney General for the State of Illinois is ordered to file on or before August 6, 2007, an answer pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Cases to Petitioner Obermeier's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

IT IS THEREFORE SO ORDERED.

ENTER: June 6, 2007.

JEANNE E. SCOTT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20070606

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.