Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Teichman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION


April 26, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HARVEY L. TEICHMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

In response to this Court's oral directive to counsel for co-defendant U.S. Bank, N.A. ("U.S. Bank") at the last status hearing, including a recommendation that he read the Appendix to State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276 (N.D. Ill. 2001), counsel has filed U.S. Bank's First Amended Answer to the Corrected Second Amended Complaint in this action. That pleading has regrettably failed to heed the admonition in App. ¶1 of the State Farm opinion that understandably emphasizes the need for a pleader to disclaim a belief in the correctness of a complaint's allegations if the pleader expects to get the benefit of a deemed denial. Accordingly U.S. Bank's counsel must again return to the drawing board to correct the flawed disclaimers promptly, once again without cost to the client.

20070426

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.