Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ware v. Garnett

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


April 9, 2007

ERIC WARE, AND YUMBA LASUMBA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JASON GARNETT, AND CHAPLAIN LOVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court are plaintiff Ware's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions. (Docs. 67 & 68). Defendants filed responses at Docs. 69 & 70.

Plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendants to respond to his interrogatories, and sanctions for their failure to respond to his discovery requests. However, as defendants sought and were granted an extension of time in which to respond, they are not delinquent. See, Doc. 61.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff Ware's Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions (Docs. 67 & 68) are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20070409

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.