IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
March 21, 2007
HERMAN TOWNSEND, PLAINTIFF,
WARDEN C. HINSLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
This matter comes before the Court for case management. Although Townsend has been proceeding in forma pauperis in this case, the Court concludes that he should have not been given permission to do so, thus, the Court REVOKES Townsend's IFP status based on the following. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, a prisoner may not be granted IFP status if he has on three prior occasions filed civil suits or appeals that were dismissed for frivolousness or failure to state a claim, unless he is in immediate danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Prior to the filing of this suit on April 14, 2003, Townsend has had three prior prisoner actions dismissed on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See e.g. Townsend v. Moore, Case No. 00-cv-1392 (C.D. Ill. August 14, 2001; Doc. 39); Townsend v. Herndon, Case No. 02-cv-6500 (N.D. Ill. September 27, 2002; Doc. 5); Townsend v. Herndon, Case No. 03-1006 (7th Cir. March 19, 2003). Further, the allegations in the underlying complaint do not show that Townsend is under immediate danger of serious physical injury.
Because Townsend has had three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury, the Court may not address the merits of his complaint until his has paid the full docket fee. Townsend shall tender the full filing fee for this case, $150.00 within fourteen days of this Order or this case will be dismissed with prejudice.*fn1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R Herndon United States District Judge