Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. McDade

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


February 1, 2007

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STACI LEEANNE MCDADE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

Now before the Court is the Government's motion in limine (Doc. 71). Specifically, the Government moves in limine to prohibit the introduction of the following as irrelevant: a CD with a recording of someone apparently made in 1994; a series of photographs; and another series of photographs of an electric curling iron. McDade opposes the motion arguing that she has an absolute right to present a defense at trial, that no evidence has been presented and as such the prosecution's motion is premature (Doc. 85). The Court agrees with Defendant. The Court DENIES at this time as premature the Government's motion in limine (Doc. 71). The Government may re-raise these issues at the appropriate time.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David RHerndon United States District Judge

20070201

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.