IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
January 25, 2007
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, PLAINTIFF, AND CONNIE STACEY, BEVERLY SANDERS, TAMMY THOMPSON, JULIE WOLF AND GRACE BELLAMY, PLAINTIFF/INTERVENORS,
J.D. STREETT & COMPANY, INC., D/B/A HARRISBURG BP, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on consideration of the proposed consent decree submitted to the Court, the motion to dismiss with prejudice filed by four of the five plaintiff/intervenors (Doc. 55) and the motion to clarify filed by the plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and the defendant J.D. Streett & Company, Inc. ("Streett") (Doc. 56).
The Court construes the plaintiff/intervenors' motion to dismiss as pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). Rule 41(a)(2) provides that only the Court may dismiss an action after an adverse party has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment and in the absence of a stipulation of dismissal of an entire case from all the parties. The Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss (Doc. 55) and DISMISSES with prejudice the claims of plaintiff/intervenors Connie Stacey, Beverly Sanders, Tammy Thompson and Grace Bellamy in this case in light of the proposed consent decree .
After reviewing the EEOC and Streett's motion to clarify and the plaintiff/intervenors' motion to dismiss, the Court is satisfied as to the issues it intended to raise at the conference regarding the proposed consent decree. The Court therefore GRANTS the motion to clarify (Doc. 56), VACATES the telephone status conference, and APPROVES the proposed consent decree between plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and defendant J.D. Streett & Company, Inc. Accordingly, it will enter the proposed consent decree with this order.
The Court further finds that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) there is no just reason for delaying the entry of judgment as to the plaintiff/intervenors' claims and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to enter a Rule 54(b) judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw Inc.