Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ware v. Garnett

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 20, 2006

ERIC WARE, AND YUMBA LASUMBA, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JASON GARNETT, AND CHAPLAIN LOVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default. (Doc. 44).

The Court first notes that the motion is purportedly filed on behalf of both plaintiffs, but is signed only by plaintiff Eric Ware. Plaintiffs are admonished that they may not file pleadings on behalf of each other. Each plaintiff represents only himself, and may file pleadings on behalf of himself only.

To date, there has not been a return of service filed showing service on defendants. Therefore, default cannot be entered.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default. (Doc. 44) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20061220

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.