Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Compton

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


November 28, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOSIAH COMPTON, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stiehl, District Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is defendant's motion to unseal the Title III wiretap application and affidavits (Doc. 594). The government has filed a response (Doc. 595), indicating that it has no objection to the Court lifting the seal subject to the protective order previously entered by the Court (Doc. 170).

Upon review of the record, the Court GRANTS defendant's motion to unseal Title III wiretap application and affidavits.

In accordance with the Court's order of protection, defense counsel must maintain in his custody, care and control, at all times, the discovery provided by the government, including the Title III wiretap documents. Counsel may show this material only to his client, and not to any other defendant These materials may not be copied or disseminated to any defendant in any form. In addition, these materials may not be left at any time in any jail, office, or other location which may allow them to be copied, redistributed or disseminated in any manner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any paper, motion or document filed with the Court involving, discussing, attaching, including or referring to the contents of any of the materials subject to this Order shall be filed under seal and shall not be served on any defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM D. STIEHL DISTRICT JUDGE

20061128

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.