Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. Walker

October 23, 2006

ADRIAN L. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROGER E. WALKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

On June 5, 2006, Plaintiff Adrian L. Jackson ("Plaintiff") filed a motion for default judgment (Doc. 25). Specifically, Plaintiff claimed that the clerk entered a default judgment against Defendants on April 25, 2006 due to their failure to respond to Plaintiff's complaint. (Id.) This matter comes before the Court on a Report and Recommendation ("the Report") filed by United States Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier on July 17, 2006. (Doc. 32.) Magistrate Judge Frazier's Report recommends that Plaintiff's motion be denied.

Under Rule 73.1 of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Illinois, the parties had ten days in which to serve and file written objections to the Report. As of this date, no objections have been filed. The period in which to file objections has expired. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Frazier's Report (Doc. 32) and DENIES Plaintiff's motion (Doc. 25).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R Herndon United States District Judge

20061023

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.