Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Scroggins v. City of Kankakee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION


October 10, 2006

ROBERT L. SCROGGINS, JR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF KANKAKEE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DAVID A. SKELLY, AVERY IVEY, AND TIMOTHY KREISSLER, IN THEIR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Michael P. McCUSKEY Chief U.S. District Judge

OPINION

A Report and Recommendation (#12) was filed by the Magistrate Judge in the above cause on September 20, 2006. More than ten (10) days have elapsed since the filing of the Recommendation and no objections have been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is, therefore, accepted by the court. See Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (7) is GRANTED. (2) Count III of Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Count I is of Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is allowed fourteen days to file an amended complaint to remedy Count I.

(3) This case is referred to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

ENTERED this 10th day of October, 2006

20061010

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.