IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
September 20, 2006
SAMUEL HOROWITZ, PETITIONER,
C/O ESSARY AND C/O MURRAY, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Deposition Upon Oral examination by Non-Stenographic Means. (Doc. 10).
Plaintiff is a pro se inmate in the custody of the IDOC. He brings suit under 42 U.S.C. §1983. An order on preliminary review was entered one on July 17, 2006. See, Doc. 7.
Plaintiff indicates that he wants to take the depositions of unidentified non-party witnesses and of defendants by means of tape recording at Menard Correctional Center. As defendants have not yet entered an appearance, the motion is premature.
Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take Deposition Upon Oral examination by Non-Stenographic Means (Doc. 10) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.