Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tate v. Chapman

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


September 7, 2006

CARL TATE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. CHAPMAN, PAM GRUBMAN, AND DR. NEWBOLD, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Request for Admissions. (Doc. 47).

Defendants have served their initial disclosures, which are attached to the motion. Plaintiff asks the Court to overrule objections to his discovery requests, but there are no requests or objections attached, and the Court is therefore unable to rule on same. Likewise, there are no requests for admissions on file.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and Request for Admissions (Doc. 47) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060907

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.