IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
September 1, 2006
GRANT WALKER, ET AL., ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
MONSANTO COMPANY PENSION PLAN, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
GLYNN DAVIS, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
SOLUTIA, INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN, DEFENDANT.
FRED DONALDSON, ET AL., INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS,
PHARMACIA PENSION PLAN ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
JUANITA HAMMOND, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFF,
SOLUTIA INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the Amended Motion to Consolidate Cases (Doc. 134) brought by Defendants Monsanto Company and Monsanto Company Pension Plan. Defendants' motion, which is unopposed, requests consolidation of this action with three related actions currently pending in this Court, to wit: Hammond v. Solutia, Inc., Employees' Pension Plan, Civil No. 06-139-DRH (S.D. Ill. filed Feb. 15, 2006); Davis v. Solutia, Inc., Employees' Pension Plan, Civil No. 05-736-DRH (S.D. Ill. filed Oct. 12, 2005); and Donaldson v. Pharmacia Pension Plan, Civil No. 06-3-DRH (S.D. Ill. filed Jan. 3, 2006).
The Court concludes in its discretion that all four actions present common questions of law and fact and that consolidation will promote judicial economy and the convenience of the parties. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); Fleishman v. Prudential-Bache Sec., Inc., 103 F.R.D. 623, 624-25 (E.D. Wis. 1984); Bradley v. Soo Line R.R. Co., 88 F.R.D. 307, 309-10 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Accordingly, Defendants' request for consolidation is GRANTED. The Court ADOPTS the "Joint Report of the Parties and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order for a Consolidated Case (Class Action)" submitted to the Court by the parties to the consolidated actions on August 17, 2006, and it is hereby FURTHER ORDERED as follows:
1. The Hammond, Davis, and Donaldson cases are consolidated pursuant to Rule 42 under the lowest docket number, Walker, 04-cv-436-DRH.All future filings in this consolidated matter shall be filed on CM/ECF under case number 04-cv-436-DRH. The schedule set forth herein for consolidated proceedings supercedes all existing and pending deadlines and scheduling orders in effect in all of the above captioned cases.
2. Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Amended Complaint by September 4, 2006.
3. Defendants shall file Answers or Motions to the Consolidated Amended Complaint by September 25, 2006.
4. The depositions of class representatives who have not previously been deposed shall be taken by October 1, 2006.
5. Plaintiff(s)' Motion for Class Certification and Memorandum in Support shall be filed on or before October 23, 2006.
6. Defendant(s)' Response to the Motion for Class Certification shall be filed on or before November 22 2006.
7. Plaintiff(s)' Reply in Support of Class Certification shall be filed on or before December 6, 2006.
8. The Class Certification hearing shall be as scheduled by the Court. The parties agree that the case will be ready for a class certification hearing by December 6, 2006.
9. After Class Certification is decided, the parties shall meet and confer again and the Court shall enter a second scheduling and discovery order to govern the remainder of the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R Herndon United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.