IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
August 28, 2006
LARRY ANTHONY NESBY, PETITIONER/DEFENDANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gilbert, District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Petitioner was found guilty of two counts involving the distribution of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. On October 3, 2002, Petitioner was sentenced to life imprisonment, a fine of $400, and a special assessment of $200. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal. United States v. Nesby, Appeal No. 02-3675 (7th Cir., May 23, 2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 853 (2003).
After he filed his initial motion (Doc. 1), a second motion was later filed and assigned a new case number (Doc. 3); those two cases were later consolidated (see Doc. 2). Petitioner has since filed two motions to amend his petition (Docs. 5, 6); a subsequent motion (Doc. 8) makes it clear that he wishes to supplement his original filings, not supplant them. The Court finds that no party will be prejudiced by allowing these amendments; accordingly, these motions are GRANTED.
In this case, Petitioner presents several arguments in support of his contention that trial counsel was ineffective. He also asserts a claim of prosecutorial misconduct, and he argues that the government failed to establish that the substance in question was crack cocaine.
The Court ORDERS the Government to file a response to Petitioner's motions (Docs. 1, 3) and amendments (Docs. 5, 6) within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Order. The Government shall, as part of its response, attach all relevant portions of the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
J. Phil Gilbert U. S. District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.