Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Schur v. L.A. Weight Loss Centers

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


August 15, 2006

CAROLYN SCHUR, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PAMELA HOPPE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
L.A. WEIGHT LOSS CENTERS, INC., LANG NATURALS, INC., RASI LABORATORIES, INC., NUTRAMED, INC., SHANI POOLE, AND OURTNEY MORR, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (Doc. 54).

The motion is directed to defendant L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc. Plaintiff seeks to compel responses to certain of her interrogatories and requests for production, and to tender certain employees for depositions. Defendant has not filed a response, and the time for doing so has now expired.

The Court deems the failure to respond to be an admission of the merits of the motion pursuant to SDIL-LR 7.1(g).

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Motion to Compel (Doc. 54) is GRANTED. Defendant L.A. Weight Loss Centers, Inc., shall respond fully to plaintiff's interrogatories numbers 5, 6, 7, 9, and 14, and produce documents responsive to requests numbers 13, 14, 15, 16, and 18, on or before August 23, 2006. Defendant shall also tender the employees requested by plaintiff for deposition at mutually agreeable dates and times.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060815

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.