IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
July 27, 2006
CARL WILSON, PLAINTIFF,
T.J. COLLINS AND JOE STEINHAUER, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
On July 6, 2006, the Court issued an Order (Doc. 48), allowing Plaintiff twenty days to file an amended complaint, for the specific purpose of naming previously unnamed defendants.*fn1 However, the Court explained that if Plaintiff did not elect to amend within the time frame prescribed, his claims against these unnamed defendants would be dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff has now filed a Motion (Doc. 49) seeking an extension until August 11, 2006, to file this amended complaint. In support, Plaintiff's counsel states that he needs to verify with his client whether there remain any unnamed defendants to name in the matter. However, because Plaintiff is incarcerated, arrangements need to be made for him to meet with his counsel and, moreover, his counsel will be out of state from August 1 through August 7, 2006.
Defendants oppose this extension of time (Doc. 50), stating that Plaintiff has had over two years to comply with naming the unnamed defendants and that he should not be entitled to further additional time.
While Defendants' frustrations are noted, justice requires allowing Plaintiff this one requested extension of time. As such, Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 49) is GRANTED, allowing Plaintiff until August 11, 2006, to file an amended complaint for the explicit purpose of naming any previously-unnamed defendants in this matter. The Court clarifies that this Order does not provide for Plaintiff to amend the substance of his Complaint in any other way.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 27th day of July, 2006.
David R. Herndon United States District Judge