Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Yates v. Disro

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


July 17, 2006

WILLIE YATES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
C/O DISRO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

A review of the record reveals that plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on October 14, 2005, before the Court's threshold review was even completed. (Doc. 5). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) dictates that a motion for summary judgment cannot be filed any sooner that 20 days after the case is commenced. Although plaintiff filed his complaint in February 2005, it is not deemed commenced until the case passes threshold review, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Thus, the case was technically commenced July 12, 2006. (Doc. 6). Moreover, as of this date the defendant has not yet waived service, been personally served with the complaint, or entered an appearance, so there is no one to respond to the motion for summary judgment.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 5) is STRICKEN as premature.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060717

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.