Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Stanfield

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


July 14, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
EARNEST STANFIELD, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' motions to continue the trial setting in this case. (Docs. 23, 25.) The Court, being fully advised in the premises, finds that trial should be postponed as to both Defendants. The Court additionally finds that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the ends of justice served by the granting of a continuance outweigh the interests of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions to continue. (Docs. 23, 25.) The Court CONTINUES Defendants' trial to Tuesday, September 18, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. The time from the date Defendants' motion was filed, July 14, 2006, until the date on which the trial is rescheduled, September 18, 2006, is excludable time for the purposes of speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R Herndon United States District Judge

20060714

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.