Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Vest

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


July 7, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES V. VEST, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

Defendant moves for leave to file a Reply to his Motion to Dismiss Indictment, due to certain statements made by the Government during oral argument for the Motion to Dismiss hearing that he wishes to address. Defendant's Motion for Leave (Doc. 50) is DENIED. Both parties had ample time prior to the hearing to fully brief the issues, including filing a reply. Further, both parties had the opportunity during the hearing itself to address any statements made or issues raised by the other party. During the hearing, neither party requested to file additional briefings. The Court does not believe justice requires doing so now.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David RHerndon United States District Judge

20060707

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.