IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
June 19, 2006
MICHAEL GRADY, PETITIONER,
B. A. BLEDSOE, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Foreman, District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This action is before the Court to rule on Petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 12). Such a motion may only be granted if movant shows there was mistake of law or fact or presents newly discovered evidence that could not have been discovered previously. Matter of Prince, 85 F.3d 314 (7th Cir. 1996), reh'g and suggestion for reh'g en banc denied, cert. denied 117 S.Ct. 608; Deutsch v. Burlington Northern R. Co., 983 F.2d 741 (7th Cir. 1993).
Upon review of the record, the Court remains persuaded that its ruling was correct: Petitioner's claims are not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Therefore, the instant motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
James L. Foreman DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.