IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
June 12, 2006
DENNIS ZAMARIONI, PLAINTIFF,
FORTIS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court for the purpose of docket control. On January 7, 2005, the Clerk of the Court issued a Notice striking Fortis' motion for leave to file appearance, jury demand, answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaim (Doc. 10). In the Notice striking the documents, the Clerk of the Court informed Fortis that the documents should be re-efiled as separate entries. A review of the record indicates that Fortis has not re-efiled these documents. Pending before the Court is Fortis' motion for summary judgment and Zamarioni's response in opposition (Docs. 23, 24, & 44). In these pleadings, both parties refer to the counterclaim even though it was never filed properly. Thus, the Court ORDERS Fortis to re-efile the documents stricken in the Clerk of the Court's January 7, 2005 Notice by June 16, 2006.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David Rherndon United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.