Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Myrick v. Synder

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


May 18, 2006

PERCY MYRICK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DONALD N. SYNDER, JR., DR. FEINERMAN, DR. GONZALEZ, M. BRIAN, MAJOR COWAN, MICHELLE PULLEY, MS. BROOKS, AND GUY D. PIERCE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court are plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 69) and defendants' Motions for Extension of Time (Docs. 71 and 73).

On April 25, 2006, the Court granted plaintiff leave to pursue limited discovery after the expiration of the deadline for completion of discovery, and ordered defendants to respond by May 15, 2006. See, Doc. 68. On May 15, 2006, defendants moved for additional time in which to respond. Thus, plaintiff's motion to compel is premature.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 69) is DENIED. Defendants' Motions for Extension of Time (Docs. 71 and 73) are GRANTED.

Defendants shall serve their answers and/or objections to plaintiff's March 20, 2006, discovery requests on or before May 30, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060518

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.