IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
May 16, 2006
KENDEL MAYS, PETITIONER/DEFENDANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, Chief District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The Court recently dismissed Petitioner's third motion to reconsider (see Docs. 21, 23); the Court had no jurisdiction to consider the motion due to Petitioner's filing of a notice of appeal. Petitioner must be unclear on the concept of "no jurisdiction," as he has just filed another Rule 60(b) motion, which he entitled a motion for proper relief (Doc. 24). Because the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the motion, this motion is DISMISSED.
A man has got to know his limitations, so the Court will very clearly define those limitations for Petitioner regarding this case: This case is CLOSED. This means that PETITIONER SHALL NOT FILE ANY FURTHER MOTIONS, PLEADINGS, OR DOCUMENTS IN THIS CASE WITH THIS COURT. This case is currently on appeal, and Petitioner should direct any filings to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals until that Court issues its mandate with respect to the appeal.
Petitioner is WARNED that if he continues to file motions in this case in this Court while the appeal is pending, the Court may find it necessary to impose monetary sanctions against him.
See FED. R. CIV. P. 11.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
G. PATRICK MURPHY Chief United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.