Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Owens v. Walker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


April 24, 2006

TYRONE OWENS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROGER WALKER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, Tyrone Owens, a former inmate in the Menard Correctional Center, brings this action for deprivations of his constitutional rights at both the Big Muddy Correctional Center and the Menard Correctional Center pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Owens is paralyzed and wheelchair bound. On July 8, 2004, the Court entered an Order which conducted the threshold review of Owens' complaint and amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (Doc. 19). In that Order, the Court dismissed several named Defendants, dismissed several of Owens' claims and re-designated Owens' various claims against the correctional officers/employees at both Big Muddy and Mendard.*fn1 Owens maintains that the prison officials, guards and the health care provides are deliberately indifferent to his needs, have subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment, have conspired to have him harmed, and have retaliated against him for filing grievances and law suits.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud submitted a Report and Recommendation ("the Report") on February 16, 2006 (Doc. 182). The Report recommends that the Court deny Defendants Walker, Uchtman, and Spiller's motion to dismiss (Doc. 116). On March 7, 2006, the Court dismissed without prejudice Owens' cause of action for want of prosecution (Doc. 191). Thereafter, Owens filed a motion to vacate judgment on March 15, 2006 (Doc. 192) which the Court granted and reopened the case on April 5, 2006 (Doc. 199). In the April 5, 2006 Order, the Court also reset the time to file objections to Judge Proud's February 16, 2006 Report.

To date, none of the parties has filed objections. The period in which to file objections has expired. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report in its entirety (Doc. 182). The Court DENIES Defendants Walker, Uchtman and Spiller's motion to dismiss (Doc. 116).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.