IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
April 10, 2006
JEFFREY SCHARRINGHAUSEN AND DOUG STRAHM, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFFS,
SOLUTIA INC. EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
This matter comes before the Court on Applicants'*fn1 Motion to Intervene (Doc. 17). On its face, the instant matter seems appropriate for intervention pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 24(b)(2). Further, the parties in the instant matter do not specifically object to the Motion to Intervene. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Applicants' Motion to Intervene (Doc. 17). Applicants will now be referred to as "Plaintiff-Intervenors."
Attached to their Motion to Intervene (Doc. 17) as Exhibits C and D, respectively, were the following: Plaintiff-Intervenors' Motion to Stay and Memorandum in Support of the Motion to Stay. Plaintiff-Intervenors are hereby allowed to file this motion and supporting memorandum, but because these do not already appear on the docket, they cannot be deemed filed instanter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed this 10th day of April, 2006.
David R Herndon United States District Judge