IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION
April 5, 2006
MARY A. GARCIA PLAINTIFF,
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Mills
On March 15, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") wherein he recommended that Defendants "Terry," "Jane Doe," and Pamela Gureski be dismissed for want of prosecution. See d/e 31 (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)). Judge Cudmore advised Plaintiff Mary A. Garcia that if she did not file written objections to the R&R by March 29, 2006, any objections would be deemed waived. See d/e 31 (citing Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986) and Local Rule 72.2).
It is now April 4, 2006, and Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R.
Accordingly, any objections are deemed waived.
ERGO, the Court ADOPTS the March 15, 2006, Report and Recommendation. Defendants "Terry," "Jane Doe," and Pamela Gureski are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.