Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Garcia v. Illinois State Police

April 5, 2006

MARY A. GARCIA PLAINTIFF,
v.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Mills

OPINION

On March 15, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Byron G. Cudmore issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") wherein he recommended that Defendants "Terry," "Jane Doe," and Pamela Gureski be dismissed for want of prosecution. See d/e 31 (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)). Judge Cudmore advised Plaintiff Mary A. Garcia that if she did not file written objections to the R&R by March 29, 2006, any objections would be deemed waived. See d/e 31 (citing Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986) and Local Rule 72.2).

It is now April 4, 2006, and Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R.

Accordingly, any objections are deemed waived.

ERGO, the Court ADOPTS the March 15, 2006, Report and Recommendation. Defendants "Terry," "Jane Doe," and Pamela Gureski are DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060405

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.