Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sanders v. U-Haul International Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 31, 2006

DAVID SANDERS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL INC., U-HAUL OF ARIZONA, AND AMERCO, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge.

ORDER

Now before the Court is Sander's motion to leave to conduct limited discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 20).*fn1 Specifically, Sanders claims that he needs to conduct minimal discovery to appropriately respond to the pending motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendants oppose the motion arguing that allowing discovery on this issue will cause further delays, is inappropriate and prejudicial to Defendants U-Haul International and AMERCO (Doc. 21). The Court agrees with Defendants. The Court finds that allowing discovery on this issue would be prejudicial to Defendants. Further, Plaintiff should have resolved this issue well before filing the instant lawsuit. Said motion is DENIED. The Court ALLOWS Sanders up to an including April 7, 2006 to file a response to the pending motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed the 31st day of March, 2006.

David RHerndon United States District Judge


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.