Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Noble v. Stevens

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 16, 2006

SUNNI NOBLE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CHARLEY STEVENS, STEVEN SMITH AND J. GARNETT, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

On December 21, 2004, Sunni Noble, a former inmate at the Menard Correctional Center, filed suit against Defendants alleging deprivations of his civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). Specifically, Noble alleges that Defendants beat him without provocation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge Donald G. Wilkerson submitted a Report and Recommendation ("the Report") on February 23, 2006 (Doc. 11). The Report recommends that the Court dismiss this case for failure to follow Court Orders and deadlines.

The Report was sent to the parties with a notice informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "objections" within ten days of service of the Report. To date, none of the parties has filed objections. The period in which to file objections has expired. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report (Doc. 11). The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's cause of action for failure to follow Court Orders and deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David RHerndon United States District Judge

20060316

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.