Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rose v. Gates

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 9, 2006

AARON ROSE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MIKE GATES, AND KATHY DAVIS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is defendants' Motion to Compel. (Doc. 42).

In July, 2005, defendants served interrogatories and requests for production on plaintiff. Plaintiff has not responded to the discovery requests or to the motion to compel. The Court deems the failure to respond to the motion to be an admission of the merits, per SDIL-LR 7.1(g).

Defendants' Motion to Compel (Doc. 42) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond fully to defendants' discovery requests by March 17, 2006.

Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order will result in sanctions. Sanctions may include dismissal of this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060309

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.