Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Perkins

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION


March 3, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DANA R. PERKINS, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Richard Mills, U.S. District Judge

OPINION

The Defendant has filed a motion for direction to U.S. Attorney. The Defendant states that after he met with Government agents following his sentencing on March 8, 2005, the Government indicated that it would file a motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). The Defendant states that he has since been inquiring of the Government as to the filing of a Rule 35(b) motion. The Defendant requests that the Government be directed to make a determination prior to the expiration of one year from the date of sentencing whether it intends to file a Rule 35(b) motion.

Ergo, the Defendant's motion for direction [d/e 68] is ALLOWED, to the extent that the Government is directed to respond to his motion by March 7, 2006.

Richard Mills United States District Judge

20060303

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.