Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Pittman

March 2, 2006

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RICHARD PITTMAN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendant James Rollins, Jr.'s Motion to Continue Trial Setting. (Doc. 163.) Defendant Rollins, Jr.'s motion states that his counsel only entered his appearance on behalf of defendant Rollins, Jr. on January 26, 2006. (Id. at ¶ 1.) Further, defendant Rollins, Jr.'s counsel has not had sufficient time to obtain and review additional discovery, due to scheduling conflicts. (Id. at ¶ 2.) The Government does not object to Defendant's Motion. (Id. at ¶ 3.)

The Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A), the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Continue. (Doc. 12.) The Court CONTINUES the jury trial scheduled for Monday, March 13, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. to Monday, June 26, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. The time from the date the original motion to continue (Doc. 163) was filed, March 1, 2006, until the date to which the trial is rescheduled, June 26, 2006, is excludable time for the purposes of speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon United States District Judge

20060302

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.