Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Doe v. Paris Union School Dist. No. 95

March 2, 2006

JOHN DOE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PARIS UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 95 AND COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Harold A. Baker United States District Judge

Order on Pending Matters

This case is before the court for consideration of all pending matters.

On January 9, 2006, the court denied the plaintiff's motions to proceed as an unidentified party and for a temporary injunction. Since then, the plaintiff has twice moved the court [37] [39] to reconsider its order. The defendants have responded to each of those motions and the plaintiff has moved to strike the response [42].

After reading and considering the motions and responses and the matters offered in support, the court is not persuaded that its order of January 9, 2006 was in error. The court reiterates the rulings stated in that order.

Accordingly, the agreed motion [35] to amend or correct the complaint is allowed. The motions to reconsider [37] [39] are denied. The motion to strike a response [42] is denied.

Enter this 2nd day of March 2006.

20060302

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.