Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tinsley v. Revell

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


February 21, 2006

STEVEN CHARLES TINSLEY, PETITIONER,
v.
S. REVELL, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is petitioner's "Motion for Instanter" (Doc. 2), which was filed simultaneously with the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1). Petitioner asks that the Court gant the petition, and he includes what appear to be exhibits from the State court record.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court have the record reflect that petitioner's "Motion for Instanter" (Doc. 2) is not a motion at all; rather, it is construed as exhibits in support of the petition (Doc. 1). The petition will be decided in due course, after consideration of the parties' briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20060221

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.