IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
February 7, 2006
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE, PLAINTIFF,
KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER, E. A. STEPP, T. BAKKE, AUGUSTINA LI, NURSE OVERTON, NURSE CROSS, P.A. WELCH, P.A. CASTILLO, AND CAPTAIN HUDSON, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, Chief District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court, sua sponte, on a mandate issued by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Clinton T. Eldridge v. Kathleen H. Sawyer, et al., No. 05-3397 (7th Cir. Dec. 20, 2005). In that case, which was an appeal of a Bivens action filed by Plaintiff in this District, the Court of Appeals issued the directive that:
Until Eldridge has paid in full all outstanding fees and any sanctions in all civil actions he has filed, the clerks of all federal courts in this circuit will return unfiled any papers submitted either directly or indirectly by or on behalf of Eldridge. This order does not apply to criminal cases or petitions challenging the terms of confinement, and may be reexamined in two years . . . .
See Doc. 141, Ex. A. Attached to the Court of Appeals' order is a list of cases which includes a number of habeas corpus cases filed by Eldridge in this District and this Bivens case.
Pursuant to the mandate, Eldridge is effectively prevented from filing any documents in all cases in this District, except criminal cases and habeas corpus cases. Therefore, the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to return, unfiled, any documents submitted by Eldridge that are unrelated to any criminal case or habeas corpus petition.
In this particular case, Eldridge will not be able to file motions to compel discovery, file or respond to any dispositive motions, or submit documents for trial. As Eldridge will not be able to meaningfully prosecute this case, it is DISMISSED without prejudice. Eldridge may re-file this action once the ban on filing has been lifted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
G. PATRICK MURPHY Chief United States District Judge
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.