United States District Court, C.D. Illinois
December 22, 2005.
MARCOS PEREZ, Plaintiff,
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: JOE McDADE, Chief Judge
Before the Court is Defendant's Bill of Costs [Doc. # 31].
Defendant seeks $983.40 in court reporter fees and $666.60 in
copying fees, for a total of $1650.00. Plaintiff has objected to
the amount of the copying fees and Defendant has responded to
Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(d)(1) states: "costs, other than attorneys'
fees shall be allowed as of course to the prevailing party unless
the court otherwise directs." "Courts applying Rule 54(d) look
first to the general taxation of costs statute,
28 U.S.C. § 1920." State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co.,
657 F.2d 855, 864 (7th Cir. 1981). That statute provides:
A judge . . . may tax as costs the following:
(1) Fees of the clerk and marshal;
(2) Fees of the court reporter for all or any part of
the stenographic transcript necessarily obtained for
use in the case;
(3) Fees and disbursements for printing and
(4) Fees for exemplification and copies of papers necessarily obtained for use in the case;
(5) Docket fees under section 1923 of this title;
(6) Compensation of court appointed experts,
compensation of interpreters, and salaries, fees,
expenses and costs of special interpretation services
under section 1828 of this title.
A bill of costs shall be filed in the case and, upon
allowance, included in the judgment or decree.
28 U.S.C. § 1920. "In order for the district court to award costs
to the prevailing party, the court must determine that the
expenses are  allowable cost items and  that the costs are
reasonable, both in amount and necessity to the litigation."
Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. Stamps, 920 F.2d 1361
1367 (7th Cir. 1990).
Plaintiff asserts that Defendant has not met its burden of
showing that the photocopied items were necessary or that they
were actually copied. In response, Defendant asserts that the
copying fees were for 4,444 copies of discovery documents that
were supplied to Plaintiff at a cost of $0.015 per page (as
attested to in an affidavit attached to Defendant's Bill of
Costs). The Court finds that these costs are reasonable.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that costs in the amount of $1,650.00
are to be taxed against Plaintiff in favor of Defendant.
© 1992-2006 VersusLaw Inc.