IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
November 29, 2005
STANTIN E. SILAS, PETITIONER/DEFENDANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Without benefit of a plea agreement, Petitioner pleaded guilty to two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). On October 10, 2003, he was sentenced to 120 months imprisonment, three years supervised release, a fine of $1000, and a special assessment of $200. An appeal was filed, but it was later withdrawn. United States v. Silas, Appeal No. 03-3794 (7th Cir., filed Oct. 20, 2003). Petitioner later filed the instant motion under § 2255. At the time he filed his case, Petitioner also filed a motion for additional time to file a memorandum in support of his § 2255 motion (Doc. 2). At this time, however, the Court sees no need for such a memorandum; therefore, this motion is DENIED.*fn1
In his motion the Petitioner raises four grounds for relief: (1) Counsel was ineffective in failing to appeal his sentence, (2) his sentence was enhanced by factors not charged in the indictment nor admitted to by him, (3) his guilty plea was not knowing and intelligent, and (4) Counsel was ineffective in failing to advise him of the consequences of his guilty plea.
The Court ORDERS the Government to file a response to Petitioner's motion within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of this Order. The Government shall, as part of its response, attach all relevant portions of the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R Herndon DISTRICT JUDGE