United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
November 2, 2005.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
STACI LEEANNE McDADE, Defendant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge
Now before the Court is McDade's motion to disclose
confidential informants and confidential sources, for Giglio
material (Doc. 20). In response, the Government agrees that all
parties should have equal access to witnesses, that it will take
no action to discourage any Government witnesses from
participating in an interview and that it will fulfil its
obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1973),
Giglio v. Unites States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972) and its progeny
(Doc. 25). Thus, the Court DENIES as moot McDade's motion to
disclose confidential informants and confidential sources, for
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.