Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. ANCILLA SYSTEMS

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


November 1, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., ANTHONY J. CAMILLO and ANTHONY CAMILLO, Individually, Plaintiff,
v.
ANCILLA SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is defendant Kenneth Hall Regional Hospital's motion to strike plaintiff Camillo's reply to its response to Camillo's motion to compel. (Doc. 135). Defendant asserts that plaintiff improperly raised a new argument in his reply, asserting waiver. Also before the Court are plaintiff's reply and defendant's response.

The Court considers defendant's motion little more than an improper sur-reply in disguise, which only served to generate another full round of argument on the same issues raised by plaintiff's motion to compel. Therefore, defendant's motion to strike will be denied. The parties should rest assured that the Court can separate the wheat from the chaff. The motion to compel will be decided upon receipt of certain documents defendant has been ordered to file under seal.

  IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant Kenneth Hall Regional Hospital's motion to strike (Doc. 135) is DENIED.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051101

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.