Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. McCRAY

October 24, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN McCRAY, Sr., Defendant.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

ORDER

Pending before the Court is McCray, Sr.'s pro se pleading filed on October 19, 2005 titled "motion requestion [sic] dismissal of indictment. On October 14, 2005, the Court appointed McCray, Sr. new counsel, Mr. Hank Branom, to represent him in this matter (Doc. 96). Because McCray, Sr. has court appointed counsel, the Court STRIKES this pleading. See Johnson v. United States, 196 F.3d 802, 805 (7th Cir. 1999) ("A district court is entitled to insist that a represented party file papers only through counsel."). Thus, the Court insists that McCray, Sr. only filed pleadings through his court appointed counsel. The Court notes that Mr. Branom is free to re-file the motion to dismiss, and any other motions, if he deems them proper.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051024

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.