Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SIDWELL v. COUNTY OF JERSEY

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


October 24, 2005.

DARREN R. SIDWELL, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of DERRICK R. SIDWELL, Deceased, Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF JERSEY; PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Sheriff; JERSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; and KEVIN KLAAS, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is a motion submitted by Plaintiffs (Doc. 7) seeking to extend the time in which they may file a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2). Pursuant to Local Rule of the Southern District of Illinois 7.1(c), "[a]n adverse party shall have thirty (30) days after the service (see FED. R. CIV. P. 6) of the movant's motion [to dismiss] in which to serve and file an answering brief." Defendant's Motion to Dismiss was filed on October 5, 2005. As is properly noted on the docket sheet, therefore, Plaintiffs, have until November 7, 2005 to respond. Plaintiffs' Motion is thus DENIED as moot (Doc. 7).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051024

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.