United States District Court, S.D. Illinois
October 18, 2005.
EUGENE HORTON, Plaintiff,
DONALD SNYDER, et al., Defendants.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for a temporary
restraining order and/or preliminary injunction preventing the
defendant Illinois Department of Corrections from vindictively
subjecting him to indefinite administrative segregation in
retaliation for his litigation activities, false information and
past disciplinary history. (Docs. 279 and 280)
Since filing the subject motion, plaintiff has withdrawn his
retaliation claim about his placement at Tamms Correctinal Center
in this case and elected to pursue a similar claim in another
case, Von Perbandt, et al. v. Snyder, 00-162-GPM. (Doc. 315).
Plaintiff is now housed at Pontiac Correctional Center, but his
motion clearly pertains to his past, and possible future
placement at Tamms. (Doc. 280, p. 3). Any issues regarding
retaliatory placement at Tamms no longer fall within the scope of
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a
temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (Doc.
279) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.