Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

HORTON v. SNYDER

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


October 18, 2005.

EUGENE HORTON, Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD SNYDER, et al., Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction preventing the defendant Illinois Department of Corrections from vindictively subjecting him to indefinite administrative segregation in retaliation for his litigation activities, false information and past disciplinary history. (Docs. 279 and 280)

Since filing the subject motion, plaintiff has withdrawn his retaliation claim about his placement at Tamms Correctinal Center in this case and elected to pursue a similar claim in another case, Von Perbandt, et al. v. Snyder, 00-162-GPM. (Doc. 315). Plaintiff is now housed at Pontiac Correctional Center, but his motion clearly pertains to his past, and possible future placement at Tamms. (Doc. 280, p. 3). Any issues regarding retaliatory placement at Tamms no longer fall within the scope of this action.

  IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (Doc. 279) is DENIED.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051018

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.