Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

UNITED STATE v. ARROYO

October 17, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
RUBEN ARROYO, Defendant.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. GILBERT, District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Ruben Arroyo's ("Arroyo") pro se motion to dismiss the charges against him (Doc. 67). Arroyo filed this motion pro se, although he is represented by attorney James Stern. A defendant does not have a right to file his own motions when he is represented by counsel. See Hayes v. Hawes, 921 F.2d 100, 102 (7th Cir. 1990) (per curiam). The Court may strike as improper any such pro se motions. See, e.g., United States v. Gwiazdzinski, 141 F.3d 784, 787 (7th Cir. 1998). The Court hereby ORDERS that Arroyo's motion (Doc. 67) be STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051017

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.