Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

SELECT THERAPY, INC. v. BRIDGEMARK OF GREENVILLE

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


October 17, 2005.

SELECT THERAPY, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
BRIDGEMARK OF GREENVILLE, LLC, d/b/a Cardinal Hill Healthcare, CARDINAL HILL HEALTHCARE, LLC, RONALD A. HUNTER, LaSALLE BANK, N.A., and JOHN DOE, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: CLIFFORD PROUD, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is Select Therapy's Motion to Reconsider Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 66).

This Court has issued a report and recommendation, in which it recommended that District Judge Stiehl grant defendant's motion for sanctions. See, Doc. 64. On October 11, 2005, plaintiff filed both timely objections to the report and recommendation and the instant motion for reconsideration. See, Docs. 65 and 66.

  Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1), when objections to a report and recommendation have been filed, the District Judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." Thus, the next step in the process is for Judge Stiehl to make a de novo determination; reconsideration by this Court is not appropriate. Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Select Therapy's Motion to Reconsider Report and Recommendation (Doc. 66) is DENIED.

  IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051017

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.