Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

U.S. v. McRAY

United States District Court, S.D. Illinois


October 13, 2005.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN McRAY, SR., EUGENE FALLS, JERRY STRAHAN, and MITCHELL BROWN, Defendants.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

ORDER

Now before the Court is Defendant Strahan's October 12, 2005 motion to continue (Doc. 93). Just last week, the Court appointed Strahan new counsel (Doc. 90). The Court being fully advised in the premises finds that Strahan's counsel needs additional time to prepare for trial. The Government does not object to the continuance. In addition, the Court finds that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ยง 3161(h)(8)(A), the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and all Defendants in a speedy trial. Therefore, the Court GRANTS Strahan's motion to continue (Doc. 93). The Court CONTINUES the jury trial scheduled for October 31, 2005 at 9:00 a.m. to February 6, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. The time from the date the original motion was filed, October 12, 2005, until the date to which the trial is rescheduled, February 6, 2006, is excludable time for the purposes of speedy trial. The parties shall notify the Court if a change of plea hearing is necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20051013

© 1992-2005 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.